NRO: Pulliam weighs in on Green vs. Green judicial race

National Review Online picked up Travis County resident Mark Pulliam's thoughts on the upcoming statewide judicial races. According to Pulliam, voters have a choice between ...

A glib, attention-seeking showman with no judicial experience versus a seasoned judge with a solid record. The March 1 primary will not only determine the Republican nominee for [Texas Supreme Court] Place 5, it will serve as a referendum on the wisdom of judicial elections. Will Texas primary voters see through this unseemly stunt?

Strong words. We're certain supporters of the challenging candidate would disagree, and that there is a reasons why the Texas Constitution allows for elected judges in certain capacities.

Who are you supporting? Let us know in the comments section below.

UPDATES: Pulliam has submitted other articles for NRO recently on the Texas statewide judicial races. We're not taking sides: these are provided for the sake of discourse and Pulliam's accomplishment of becoming a regular judicial issues columnist:

http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/429207/texas-supreme-court-elections-eva-guzman-joe-pool  (Guzman-Pool race)

http://www.nationalreview.com/bench-memos/427762/sharia-law-texas-supreme-court-election (Lehrmann-Massengale race)